Pre-publication quality review
Know what needs checking before you publish.
A completed draft still needs review. SEOAGENT organizes questions about the content and its supporting materials so you know where to look.
Check the questions you set out to answer
Review pointers to where an intended question is addressed in the article.
Review supporting evidence
Separate supported claims from items that could not be verified. AI assessments are identified as such.
Use the findings to improve the draft
Add information or revise the wording, and run fact or similarity checks when needed.
The workflow
- Create the draft
- Review findings
- Improve the text or evidence
- Check again and publish
An example
When describing product performance, compare the claim with the actual specification rather than leaving an unsupported statement in place.
What you can do on screen
- Results appear in the pre-publication check. It never blocks publishing; it highlights what to review.
- Items are grouped into questions to answer, figures and experience, heading promises, body condition, and page settings.
- It also flags leftover placeholder text, possibly truncated body text, and mismatched figures in structured data.
- Fact checks are run manually and show results such as supported, contradicted, or unknown.
- The plagiarism check estimates overlap with pages found through Google Search. It is not a comparison against every document.
What to know
Checks do not guarantee factual accuracy, legal clearance, or search performance. Not every issue automatically blocks publication.
Does passing a check remove the need for human review?
No. AI can miss problems. Have someone responsible for the content verify business facts and specialist claims.
If the plagiarism check is clear, is the article safe to publish?
It is one indicator. It compares against pages found through search, not everything. A person should still make the final review.